On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 3:13 PM, René Rebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the attached patch allows compiling cuneiform on non-x86 platforms, > however PUMA_Init fails, AFAICS reading some data file and probably some > sanity checks failing due missing portable data file reads (such as > endianess swaps). Does someone know enough DOS/Windows programming to know why they are calling the interrupt? Does it have some special side-effects? Could we just get rid of it altogether and just use abort() everywhere? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~cuneiform Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~cuneiform More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
