On Friday 18 February 2011 16:15:49 Andreas Zwinkau wrote: > A counter-argument would be that is ok that typecheck-gcc.h relies on > implementation-specific gcc behavior, but non-portable code should be > avoided.
The question is why typecheck-gcc.h is getting included when you are not compiling with gcc. Kamil ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
