On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM, tatebn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Have to figure out which of the many libcurl libs that one refers >> too. But out of curiosity, since the only discrepancy between the >> testing.cgi and the example, as far as ldd output goes, is those 3 lib >> versions, and the 3 seemingly offending libs are brought in by curlpp, >> if libcurlpp were recompiled to link to the same libs as the example >> executable, the duplicate libs should not matter because nothing will >> be linking to them. Is that correct? > > > Probably. The other solution to try would be to link statically the > libraries > for your cgi... You wouldn't have that problem.... > > So, you're sure the command line was working? > >> >> On Aug 17, 12:35 pm, Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > remove the lib too (back up them), restart the webserver, so it will try >> to >> > reload the libraries. >> > My suspicion is that the webserver won't restart. >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:30 PM, tatebn <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Nevermind. I just noticed the URL option was still commented out. >> > > Back to square one. Still dying. >> > >> > > On Aug 17, 12:25 pm, tatebn <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > I deleted the /usr/local/include/curl folder, after making a tar of >> it >> > > > of course, and now the application runs without dying. Test credit >> > > > card runs gets declined, but that's supposed to happen. Thanks for >> > > > all your help. Don't forget about me, I might not be out of the >> woods >> > > > yet. >> > >> > > > On Aug 17, 12:13 pm, tatebn <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > I understand that I need to get rid of the different libraries, >> but I >> > > > > don't know how. I don't want to just rm them because God knows >> what >> > > > > kind of hell that will unleash. So I guess I could rename them >> with a >> > > > > different extension, perhaps that would be the solution for now. >> Keep >> > > > > the .so.4 versions of everything? >> > >> > > > > On Aug 17, 12:01 pm, Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre >> > >> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:56 AM, tatebn < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > I was able to run from the command line, but the executable I >> ran >> > > from >> > > > > > > the command line had those different versions. The older >> versions. >> > >> > > > > > > How do I check the webserver environment libraries? >> Testing.cgi, >> > > > > > > which is what gets run from the browser, had different >> libraries >> > > from >> > > > > > > the working example executable as well as duplicates. >> > >> > > > > > You need to solve this first. I can't emphasize enough on this >> point: >> > > Get >> > > > > > rid of >> > > > > > the different libraries. You won't go any further before doing >> so. >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "curlpp" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/curlpp?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
