Greg Troxel wrote: > Should these 50 new failures be marked as XFAIL? I think it's important > that we put (at least most) known to be broken tests as xfail so that > the failed count being high is a sign of a regression.
FWIW, I already sent private mail to reinoud on Saturday asking him to do that, but I have not received a response. -- Andreas Gustafsson, [email protected]
