On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 7, 6:11pm, [email protected] (Ryota Ozaki) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: Revisiting DTrace syscall provider > > | I first did so but I changed back to systrace because FreeBSD named it > | systrace and named modules for syscall emulations as systrace_linux32 > | and systrace_freebsd32. If we follow so, we should keep systrace name as is? > > Seeing how much confusion "systrace" is causing I renamed it again: > > dtrace_syscall > dtrace_syscall_netbsd32 > dtrace_syscall_linux > ...
Yea, they're better than dtrace_systrace* :) BTW please don't forget to rename its internal name. (See http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/external/cddl/osnet/dev/fbt/fbt.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18&f=u ) > > | NP, please do it :) > > I am making one more change to make things even simpler than what FreeBSD > did and save more space. Thanks! ozaki-r > > Thanks, > > christos
