On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:46:46AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > Hi, > > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > >I don't see why we have to provide it. The broken objective C headers > >can just undef it if they want to insist... > > it is a reserved keyword, it is like you would mess up with "const", > just that you can't because you are writing C code. You may argue it > was a bad choice to prepend it with __, but it is not my decision > nor those people who implemented the open versions of this language. > > You can continue with your stubbornness or not, up to you. I like > operating systems who play nice to different languages and NetBSD > has a long tradition of being friendly.
If they want to mess with the implementation namespace, they can just as easily undef it. Joerg