rhia...@falu.nl (Rhialto) writes:
>I tried it on some fairly idle machines, and the result was quite
>consistent. It really looks like there is something in there that
>inadvertently always causes an extra tick delay.
tick
- some nanoseconds later
- you wake up
- you sleep for at least one tick
tick
- not enough yet because the first interval was
a few nanoseconds too short
tick
- some nanoseconds or microseconds later
- you wake up
...
N.B. nanosleep shouldn't be based on ticks.
--
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: mlel...@serpens.de
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
