On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, > Paul Goyette <[email protected]> wrote: > >However, looking at the source file for lib/libc/sys/settimeofday.c we > >have the following comment which says that we first try the syscall() > >and only use the /dev/clockctl mechanism if the syscall() fails: > > Using the syscall is simpler and cheaper, so I think the man page should > be updated. > Is settimeofday() called frequently enough that "cheaper" is a concern? What is more correct (I don't know the answer)? -- Rich
