On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 01:51:38PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >> BTW should we mark pf and ipf deprecated in netbsd-8 as they aren't >> well maintained nowadays? > > While they are not maintained, PF works quite well for the feature set > our version has. There are still quite a few issues with NPF, primarily > documentation issues, but also some functional ones. It seems a bit > premature to deprecate IPF and PF in the current situation. That said, > they should certainly be considered legacy functionality.
Hmm, I thought npf is mature. I think it's better to have TODOs of npf somewhere to clarify what we need to do to make it mature enough. ozaki-r
