On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:54:37PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:45:55AM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > > The only time we've ever really dug into it, I believe, the user decided > > the failures were right around the expected failure rate. Can you help > > gather more data? > > Good point, and I am not sure this might cover my case as well - will have > a look and start gathering better data.
Maybe we should alert in a more sophisticated way -- monitor the failure rate and alert only if it is significantly above the expected rate. I might even remember enough statistics to do that. -- Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com Ring the bells that still can ring.