is current-users the right/best place to follow these problems?

I should probably pay more attention to the build failure notifications.  :(

Thanks,
Paul N.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Paul Goyette <p...@whooppee.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, pimin inwa wrote:
>
> Fixed that problem but now I get:
>>
>> m_bio.c -o uvm_bio.o
>> /usr/src/sys/uvm/uvm_bio.c: In function 'ubc_fault':
>> /usr/src/sys/uvm/uvm_bio.c:358:45: error: missing terminating " character
>> [-Werror]
>>       "out of range write: slot=%#"PRIxVADDR"
>>                                             ^
>> In file included from /usr/src/sys/sys/systm.h:427:0,
>>                 from /usr/src/sys/sys/timevar.h:66,
>>                 from /usr/src/sys/sys/time.h:307,
>>                 from /usr/src/sys/sys/param.h:145,
>>                 from /usr/src/sys/uvm/uvm_bio.c:42:
>> /usr/src/sys/uvm/uvm_bio.c:357:3: error: expected expression before '<<'
>> token
>> <<<<<<< uvm_bio.c
>>   ^
>> /usr/src/sys/lib/libkern/libkern.h:275:33: note: in definition of macro
>> 'KASSERTMSG'
>>        kern_assert(__KASSERTSTR msg, "diagnostic ", #e,     \
>>                                 ^
>> /usr/src/sys/uvm/uvm_bio.c:357:3: error: missing terminating " character
>> <<<<<<< uvm_bio.c
>>   ^
>> /usr/src/sys/lib/libkern/libkern.h:275:33: note: in definition of macro
>> 'KASSERTMSG'
>>        kern_assert(__KASSERTSTR msg, "diagnostic ", #e,     \
>>                                 ^
>> /usr/src/sys/uvm/uvm_bio.c:365:1: error: expected expression before '>>'
>> token
>> >>>>>>> 1.89
>> ^
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>
>
> yes.  I think that one is still broken at the moment.
>
>
>
>
> +------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+
> | Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:      |
> | (Retired)        | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com   |
> | Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
> +------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+
>

Reply via email to