On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:05:33PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:18:16 +0100 > From: Roy Marples <r...@marples.name> > Message-ID: <58598dae-238e-44a5-e74f-bbb2fdd7b...@marples.name> > > | No-one has yet weighed in on how this should be resolved. > > Go back to silently discarding the error (at least, by default). > Datagram type services (which is what the routing socket, > and others like it, are) generally are just "best effort" with > no error reporting at all. The higher level protocol needs to > cope.
Sure, but we also have a history of at least providing a "best effort" to notify the source when the datagrams are discarded locally. Joerg
