On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:05:17PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote: > I think it is the following change (and perhaps more similar/related > changes) which breaks static linking of applications which wish to > supply their own implementation of malloc(), and which call, e.g., > fork():
I consider it a strong WONTFIX. It's no different from not poviding posix_memalign etc. Joerg