> So: happy to make it more userfriendly, simpler, rephrase messages,
> whatever needed - but we should not end up with insecure installs.

Lack of good randomness does not quite equal insecure install.  Warn
about it, sure, but I think *requiring* randomness is a bad idea.  For
example, I've been working with recent NetBSD at work, for something
for which the presence or absence of good random-seed data makes
absolutely no difference to security.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Reply via email to