> So: happy to make it more userfriendly, simpler, rephrase messages, > whatever needed - but we should not end up with insecure installs.
Lack of good randomness does not quite equal insecure install. Warn about it, sure, but I think *requiring* randomness is a bad idea. For example, I've been working with recent NetBSD at work, for something for which the presence or absence of good random-seed data makes absolutely no difference to security. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B