Roy Marples <r...@marples.name> writes:
> On 11/11/2020 01:49, Brad Spencer wrote:
>> @@ -2352,6 +2361,7 @@
>> if (*af == AF_INET) {
>> packet_len = ntohs(ip->ip_len);
>> } else {
>> +#ifdef INET6
>> const struct ip6_hdr *ip6;
>>
>> if (__predict_false(decrypted_len < sizeof(struct ip6_hdr)))
>
>
> Might be better to roll it into case statement.
> Could wg one day work with a third address family?
>
> Roy
No earthly idea if that would ever be likely. In the short to medium
term, I suspect not. I am inclined to leave it as I have proposed
unless it functionally breaks something. I have zero ability to test
this path completely and the VPN provider I am using forcefully disables
IPv6 on their end. This topic can be left for a later time.
--
Brad Spencer - b...@anduin.eldar.org - KC8VKS - http://anduin.eldar.org
