m...@mjch.net ("Malcolm Herbert") writes:
>As far as I understand it, ZFS vdevs have their own ID, so they can be laid
>out correctly no matter the OS device each are discovered on ... wouldn't that
>make a raidframe wrapper redundant? it would also mean the zpool vdevs
>couldn't be used on other systems that understand ZFS because they're unlikely
>to understand raidframe ...
The device paths are cached, thus the need to re-import. Ideally the cache
would be invalidated automatically, but I was told is not in our code base.
--
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: mlel...@serpens.de
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
