> > On Dec 8, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Greg A. Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That's one bullet I've dodged entirely already since my oldest systems > > are running netbsd-5 stable. (Though in theory isn't there supposed to > > be COMPAT support for SA?) > > int > compat_60_sys_sa_register(lwp_t *l, > const struct compat_60_sys_sa_register_args *uap, > register_t *retval) > { > return sys_nosys(l, uap, retval); > } > > SA is one of those things that's REALLY hard to provide compatibility for.
indeed, and only static userland would be affected, as ad@ also provided replacement libpthread.so's for netbsd-4 that made it use the newer kernel system instead, for use in chroot, and this technique could also be provided for earlier if needed. .mrg.
