Dear pin, On 2021-12-28, pin wrote: > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Tuesday, December 28th, 2021 at 16:29, Yorick Hardy > <yorickha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear pin, > > > > On 2021-12-27, pin wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've upgraded my amd64 machine to NetBSD-9.99.93 yesterday and I'm > > > experience serious crashes which were not happening on 9.99.92. > > > > > > dmesg, https://pastebin.com/8WJeUJDj > > > > > > Xorg-log, https://pastebin.com/xTAmUZPU > > > > > > The backtraces from the coredumps aren't really useful, > > > https://pastebin.com/eaXYEC0Z > > > > > > I've managed to reproduce the crashes by launching lariza or badwolf web > > > browsers. > > > > > > The system runs without issues if I don't use a web browser. > > > > > > Also, I've noticed the following while booting after a crash > > > > > > panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" failed: file > > > "/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c", line 525 > > > > > > Finally, unsure if related, console resolution doesn't scale after > > > loading i915drmkms0, it used to in 9.99.92. > > > > > > Although, resolution after startx is correct. > > > > > > I've hosted the core-dumps in case, > > > > > > netbsd.2.core.gz, https://ufile.io/d00lfx4f > > > > > > netbsd.2.gz, https://ufile.io/4yvklq5w > > > > > > Thank you for any hints. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > pin > > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > > > Somehow I managed to get a backtrace (it seems to be correct): > > > > Crash version 9.99.82, image version 9.99.93. > > > > WARNING: versions differ, you may not be able to examine this image. > > > > crash: _kvm_kvatop(0) > > > > Kernel compiled without options LOCKDEBUG. > > > > System panicked: kernel diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" failed: > > file "/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c", line 525 > > > > Backtrace from time of crash is available. > > > > crash> bt > > > > _KERNEL_OPT_GENFB_GLYPHCACHE() at 0 > > > > _KERNEL_OPT_GENFB_GLYPHCACHE() at 0 > > > > sys_reboot() at sys_reboot > > > > vpanic() at vpanic+0x160 > > > > __x86_indirect_thunk_rax() at __x86_indirect_thunk_rax > > > > unp_send() at unp_send+0xa15 > > > > sosend() at sosend+0x845 > > > > soo_write() at soo_write+0x2f > > > > do_filewritev.part.0() at do_filewritev.part.0+0x25d > > > > syscall() at syscall+0x196 > > > > --- syscall (number 121) --- > > > > syscall+0x196: > > > > crash> > > > > the last change I could find which might be relevant was in > > sys/kern/sys_generic.c 1.133, but that > > > > was before 9.99.93, so I am not sure where to look. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Yorick Hardy > > Thanks! > > Was this change made in 9.99.92 after the 15th of December? > > Until the above date this did not happen. > > Regards
11 September, so: long before! But thanks, I will continue to look for any changes after 15 December (I am sure someone more knowledgeable will find it, but I will have a go in the mean time). -- Kind regards, Yorick Hardy