On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 03:46:14PM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > On Linux clone(2) is declared only for _GNU_SOURCE, which explains why > linux doesn't run into the name clash. I gather we should follow > suit, as that's what the apps expect.
Yes, that is the right thing to do here, especially as clone(2) does only exist as a portability helper for linux code. I think we could even pull that change up to -9. Martin
