In article <[email protected]>, Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi! > >NetBSD after the switch to binutils 2.39 does not install the >following files any longer, but they are not marked as obsolete >either: > >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.x >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xbn >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xc >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xd >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xdc >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xdw >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xn >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xr >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xs >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xsc >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xsw >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xu >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_k1om.xw >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.x >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xbn >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xc >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xd >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xdc >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xdw >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xn >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xr >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xs >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xsc >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xsw >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xu >/usr/libdata/ldscripts/elf_l1om.xw > >Should new binutils install them, or should they be marked as obsolete? > They should be marked as obsolete...
christos
