In article <1617.1685135...@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>, Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> wrote: > >I'll keep looking, and see if there is a reasonable path forward, which >allows rump's bizarre etfs to function as needed, without completely >breaking normal unix pathname resolution semantics.
Perhaps add a flag to the mount command to not do the realpath check? christos
