On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 10:05:15AM +0200, Jan-Hinrich Fessel wrote: > Hej there, > > tried that on several fresh installations now with src grabbed via cvs > checkout. No one else seeing this? > I am somewhat lost in how to fix this apart from modifying the source list > (md.amd64 that would be) > > because i see there: > grep openssl lists/base/md.amd64 > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl base-crypto-usr > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/engines base-crypto-usr > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/engines/dasync.so base-crypto-usr > compat,pic,openssl=30 > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/engines/devcrypto.so base-crypto-usr > compat,pic,openssl=30 > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/engines/loader_attic.so base-crypto-usr > compat,pic,openssl=30 > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/engines/ossltest.so base-crypto-usr > compat,pic,openssl=30 > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/engines/padlock.so base-crypto-usr > compat,pic,openssl=30 > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/modules base-crypto-usr > ./usr/lib/i386/openssl/modules/legacy.so base-crypto-usr > compat,pic,openssl=30
This seem to be leftovers that should be removed, all "compat" handling for OpenSSL is done generically now (see src/etc/mtree/NetBSD.dist.compat.in) Do you build with MKCOMPAT=no or something? Martin
