Tobias Nygren <[email protected]> wrote:

> The header being used from the tools build was an unexpected surprise
> but such reasons are why those ifdef guards exist. So I think it
> just just be put back the way it was. The example came from
> sys/atomic.h so it shouldn't be controversial.

I've just reverted the last change, putting back the
ifdefs and <stdint.h>.  Apologies for the breakage!

-Jan

Reply via email to