Sergey Skvortsov píše v pá 20. 01. 2006 v 14:27 +0300: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Edwin Groothuis wrote: > >> > >> Edwin Groothuis wrote: > >>>> FreeBSD ports repository > >>>> > >>>> Added files: > >>>> net/ssldump/files patch-ssl%ssldecode.c > >>> Did I miss a naming-convention change? > > > >> History repeats itself... Ok. > >> > >> 1. I dislike "_" as path delimiter. It's not so obvious and aesthetic as > >> "::" or "%". > > > > I don't like it neither, but I accepted the fact that there was a > > proper naming standard for it so at least this wildgrowth of patch > > files would be resolved. > > First of all, it is not a "proper naming standard". I always suggest to > use SHOULD/MUST/etc words (RFC 2119) in "Porters' Handboook" to avoid > any incomprehension. In current situation I prefer to treat "Please only > use characters [-+._a-zA-Z0-9]" as "You SHOULD use characters > [-+._a-zA-Z0-9]". > > Many committers do not like this "convention". Hence the above regex > should be reviewed and extended. There is no technical problems with > additional ":%" symbols. Patch names must be convenient, not procrustean.
Actually the policy was installed because % in file names gave problems
when importing CVS into Perforce.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can't do that, that would make sense.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
