On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 23:53 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 05:20:55PM +0000, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > marcus 2008-05-25 17:20:54 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > sysutils Makefile > > sysutils/conky Makefile > > sysutils/conky-awesome Makefile pkg-descr > > Added files: > > sysutils/conky-awesome/files patch-src_conky.c > > Log: > > Add sysutils/conky-awesome after a repocopy from sysutils/conky. > > Conky-awesome is the conky X-based system monitor ported to the awesome > > window manager. > > > > Submitted by: adamw > > Conky diffs approved by: novel > > Does this really warrant a port of its own? Couldn't it just be a KNOB > in sysutils/conky?
This kind of changes (requiring new patches and a new pkg-descr) typically have warranted slave ports in the past (e.g. we do this a lot with language ports). I didn't see a problem with this. Additionally, it offloads the work of maintaining the conky-awesome changes from novel onto adamw. Joe > > Brix -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part