On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 05:37:24PM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Well, as I said it might not be something strictly required, but why not be > nice to ISVs and users? Ability to run binaries compiled on 6.4 on previous > 6.x releases is really important in many situations.
No, it can be quite error prone. > That's probably one > of the reasons why big software vendors (Oracle, Sun etc) are very > reluctant to provide native binary packages for FreeBSD. I really don't think you're giving their justification... Even Sun adds things to Solaris 10 updates. UPWARD binary compatibility is what's guaranteed. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
