On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:21:04PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Below you have changed a few places back to actually use bcmp instead > of memcmp. > I see lots of or more places in our kernel using memcmp. Are you > saying that they all need to be memcmp instead of bcmp and had been > unproper results so far
I am not saying the memcmp's I did not touch have to be memcmp and cannot be changed to bcmp(). > or is the files down just a random collection > of memcmp->bcmp changes introduced with the same commit? They are not random, but the set of memcmp uses in $ARCH/$ARCH that did not depend on the memcmp behavior, and are pure BSD files and thus bcmp() usage should not upset anyone. I did not touch drivers that may be trying to share code or otherwise have minimal changes. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
