Garance A Drosihn píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 18:18 -0400: > >That is the only case I can think of. Even changing the comment or > >pkg-descr should have its PORTREVISION bumped in order to get a new > >package built so users have the fresh description. > > Ew, I don't like that at all. Why should I rebuild (say) bash just > because someone fixes a typo in the description? The port is already > installed, and I have no intention of reading the description until > *maybe* the next time the package really does change. > > It's probably not that big a deal for bash, which is fairly easy to > build and well-behaved. Now let's change the pkg-descr for some key > component of Gnome, and have people spend a day to rebuild it and > everything that depends on it, just because a description changed?
Certainly not everything that depends on it. You have a good overview of
how ports work?
--
Pav Lucistnik <p...@oook.cz>
<p...@freebsd.org>
Can't sing. Can't dance. Can handle a sword a little.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
