Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 20:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Isn't this bass-ackwards? Is there some functionality from unzip that
>> this port needs that the version now in the base does not provide? If
>> that's the case, can someone make that issue known so that interested
>> parties can address it?
>
> There are two issues. The first is a lack of zipinfo. The unzip port
> includes the zipinfo binary which can be invoked via unzip by passing
> the -Z argument (i.e. unzip -Z is equivalent to calling zipinfo).
>
> The other major feature lacking in /usr/bin/unzip is password support.
> The unzip port supports password-encoded archives (via the -P argument),
> and the base version does not.
>
> If both of these issues get addressed, the base unzip would be fine.
> Without the fixes, file-roller is useless when it comes to zip archives.
That makes sense, thanks.
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
