On 11/28/2010 23:51, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
My point is that once file is in CVS, we should try to use it even if
the name is not perfectly in line with standard scheme. The rationale
behind this rule is roughly the same as why we are not renaming existing
`patch-xy' patches or patches containing ::, for example.
One could make the argument that this would be one point in favor of
moving the ports repo to svn, since 'svn mv' is basically free. Moving
to svn would also eliminate the related problem of repo-copies.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
