On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:56:45PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 16:45:28 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:09:44AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > Alexey, I appreciate your perspective on this, but I want to make > > > sure you are aware of the related discussion (and opposing > > > viewpoints) on freebsd-ports: > > > > Yes, I've heard that reasoning a number of times since I started to > > hack on ports, which is a relatively long period. > > Your long hacking tenure aside, I am just glad to know you are aware of > other reasonable opinions on this topic.
Don't get me wrong, I just wanted to make myself clear that I've had enough time to collect various opinions on the subject to make some meaningful judgment about it. No way I am implying that my opinions should have more weight than others' just because of that. > > Technically, since there is no supporting infrastructure to ensure if > > some app really requires particular shlib version or not (and I > > personally do not see how it can be implemented automatically for any > > arbitrary port out there), the whole issue right now is little more > > than a matter of personal preference. > > Emphasis on 'personal preference'. No sure I quite understand what do you mean. Perhaps you could elaborate? So far it seems that my assessments are not being counterargued with valid technical points and facts. ./danfe _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
