On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 08:02:16AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:54:10PM +0000, Andrey Slusar wrote:
> > anray       2006-04-14 21:54:10 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     lang/rscheme/files   patch-..::modules::corelib::corelib.mcf 
> >   Added files:
> >     lang/rscheme/files   patch-..::modules::regex::runmatch.c 
> >                          patch-..::stage0::corelib::complex.c 
> >                          patch-..::stage0::regex::runmatch.c 
> >   Log:
> >   Fix build warnings.
> >   
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.2       +8 -4      
> > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::modules::corelib::corelib.mcf
> >   1.1       +55 -0     
> > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::modules::regex::runmatch.c (new)
> >   1.1       +13 -0     
> > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::stage0::corelib::complex.c (new)
> >   1.1       +55 -0     
> > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::stage0::regex::runmatch.c (new)
> 
> I was under impression that we dumped '::' patch naming convention for
> new patches a while ago.
> 
Me, too. I just use whatever filename ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl
invents, it works quite reasonable.

-- 
Vasil Dimov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
                -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

Attachment: pgpVnl7SKz8Cr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to