On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 08:02:16AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:54:10PM +0000, Andrey Slusar wrote: > > anray 2006-04-14 21:54:10 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > lang/rscheme/files patch-..::modules::corelib::corelib.mcf > > Added files: > > lang/rscheme/files patch-..::modules::regex::runmatch.c > > patch-..::stage0::corelib::complex.c > > patch-..::stage0::regex::runmatch.c > > Log: > > Fix build warnings. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.2 +8 -4 > > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::modules::corelib::corelib.mcf > > 1.1 +55 -0 > > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::modules::regex::runmatch.c (new) > > 1.1 +13 -0 > > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::stage0::corelib::complex.c (new) > > 1.1 +55 -0 > > ports/lang/rscheme/files/patch-..::stage0::regex::runmatch.c (new) > > I was under impression that we dumped '::' patch naming convention for > new patches a while ago. > Me, too. I just use whatever filename ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl invents, it works quite reasonable.
-- Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra
pgpVnl7SKz8Cr.pgp
Description: PGP signature