Maxim Sobolev wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:

BTW, I have noticed that we don't mark lapic page as noncacheable, which seemingly required by the spec. I have made small change (3 lines), but it doesn't help either.

You can also try the PAT patch which would have the side effect of
forcing the lapic to be mapped UC as well.

Where can I get it?

If it's the one which have been committed today then it doesn't help. :(

-Maxim
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to