On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 04:19:18PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:57:28PM +0000, Shaun Amott wrote:
> > shaun 2006-08-23 20:57:28 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > news/inn Makefile
> > Log:
> > Amend hostname check to succeed if /bin/hostname fails.
> > Another work-around for those pesky amd64 machines.
>
> This isn't going to work as you intend since the IGNORE check is run
> on pointyhat to decide whether to build the ports, which naturally
> succeeds.
Well, maybe this wasn't the right approach, but I did intend the check
to affect pointyhat builds.
> The real issue here is not 'amd64 machines' but ports built in a jail
> without access to a DNS server (this will become the default in the
> near future).
I know - I wasn't suggesting it was a problem with amd64 as a platform -
it's just a coincidence that the affected machines have all been amd64.
The port checks that the machine/jail's hostname is valid (i.e.
host.domain), not just resolvable, and the work-around seems to work
in both cases I have seen.
> Why does this port need to look up its hostname during build? If it
> is hard-coding the result in the package, then it is clearly wrong.
> On the other hand if it not hard-coding the result then it begs the
> question of why do it at all.
The look-up is performed as part of a syntax check on the default config
file. The hostname is inserted into the file, which, as you you say, is
wrong.
I have come up with an alternative solution to this issue, which I shall
apply to the inn ports shortly.
Shaun
--
Shaun Amott [ PGP: 0x6B387A9A ]
Scientia Est Potentia.
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
