On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:32:42PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:29:56AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:06:52AM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure it will be accepted by Brian since another option > > > already allowed its argument to be specified without a preceding > > > space, > > > > I don't think so. My experience shows that he does not accept fixes > > easily, f.e. our locale POSIX and GNU awk compatible fixes many people > > send to him several times already. I can't tell for sure about this change > > exactly, but... > > > Let's see... I sent the patches already to Brian.
It is what we exactly can do, dealing with 3rd party maintainers. What happens next is beyond our control... But we _must_ keep our local fixes in anyway even they are not accepted. BTW, inspecting the nature of arguments fix I think now it have high probability to be accepted. The questions is other our fixes. F.e. do you try to send him locale fixes? I do it several times and got no answer at all. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
pgpRTjZq642gJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature