On 2006.09.26 05:27:16 +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > sat 2006-09-26 05:27:16 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > security/vuxml vuln.xml > Log: > - Update the unace advisory
Why did you add the Secunia advisory in the body? Isn't it just different wording for the same issues? Also, it's generally a bad idea to use <ge> if the port isn't fixed since you risk someone bumping port reversion etc. and therefor marking the port as fixed when it really isn't. -- Simon L. Nielsen _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"