On 2006.09.26 05:27:16 +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> sat         2006-09-26 05:27:16 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     security/vuxml       vuln.xml 
>   Log:
>   - Update the unace advisory

Why did you add the Secunia advisory in the body?  Isn't it just
different wording for the same issues?

Also, it's generally a bad idea to use <ge> if the port isn't fixed
since you risk someone bumping port reversion etc. and therefor
marking the port as fixed when it really isn't.

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to