On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:57:04AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> i think Andre's question was this:
> normally we use {set|get}sockopt() to configure the socket
> as desired for special features (e.g. multicast is one).
>
> Why is it undesirable to use the same kind of overloading
> for sctp ?
I think some of the reasons for why a new sockets API
was introduced for SCTP was outlined in:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-14.txt
...but I'll let Randall chime in too. :)
--
Craig Rodrigues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
