On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 at 16:19:08 +0000, Shaun Amott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:37:08PM +0000, Tim Bishop wrote:
>> The complete list isn't too bad:
>>
>> ... (about 20 deleted)
>>
>> If they can all be changed to used bash 3 instead we'd be in a position
>> to start deprecation of bash 2.
>
> I bet some of these could be easily converted to use sh(1).

I'd be really surprised if any didn't work with bash 3.  Note that the
original test was just for the presence of bash, not bash 2.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.

Attachment: pgp4EJetzIbCT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to