Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> The 104877 fix is not in ports tree right now, so I think we still need
> to put an entry in UPDATING for our users' sake.
I just started a thread on -ports@ for this topic, since now that I
understand it, I agree that it's a more serious issue.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
