David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:22:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 01:28:23 pm David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Shipping a libkse.so.3 in 7.0, would be yet another FreeBSD weirdism as
folks may wonder where .1 & 2 are.
They are right here:
/usr/ports/misc/compat5x/pkg-plist:%%SPARC64%%lib/compat/libkse.so.1
/usr/ports/misc/compat6x/pkg-plist.sparc64:lib/compat/libkse.so.2
Where did those come from? That is another weirdism as they don't exist
on i386:
..
These archs use libthr for libpthread because of lacking full libkse
support, and install libkse as libkse as a result. They are analogous
to libpthread.so.[12] on i386. Basically, libpthread was renamed to
libkse on some archs and libthr on others in 7.0, and libpthread is now
always a symlink. Given that, I think libkse should be libkse.so.3 in
7.
Sparc64 is the only arch where this applies... I wonder how many sparc64
users we have with threaded applications built on pre-releng7 that will
want to run them without recompiling... I think I have more fingers and
toes..
So you wouldn't mind if we chopped them off? You only have a few of
them after all so they can't be all that important ;)
Just use .3, the above argument is pretty conclusive. It really doesn't
matter to anyone to not do this.
Kris
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
