* Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2007-10-31 ]
[ Re: cvs commit: src/include _ctype.h ]
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:33:49PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > For ones who doubts there two tests compiled with -O2. As you may see the
> > > result is almost identical (andl vs cmpl):
> >
> > Q.E.D. How about to restore original, more reader-friendly version then?
>
> 1. Reader-friendly version generates long code when absolutely no
> optimization used in compiler (for some reason f.e. to avoid optimization
> bugs).
So if someone is trying to avoid compiler optimization bugs we should subject
them to human optimization bugs instead? :)
> 2. It also breaks common style ctype using for is{w}ascii(). If revert
> this, is{w}ascii() should be rewritted too.
That seems reasonable.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
