* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071125 10:05] wrote: > > not sure why sx-locks exist at all, as they seem to be a variant of sleep. > I think it's just a convenience function set to allow one to implement > a sleep-derived synchronisation.
You are correct, sx locks are a faster replacement for hand rolled msleep locks. They're not only easier to read, but the underlying implementation is faster. -- - Alfred Perlstein _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
