In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On 2007-12-11 20:00, Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Don't assume that make(1) is a bsd-like make program. It might not
: > be. This only matters in the early stages of bootstrapping, of
: > course, but gnu make can't handle bsd make Makefiles at all if they
: > use any of the 'dot' directives, which src/Makefile has in abudnance.
: >
: > Revision Changes Path
: > 1.343 +5 -3 src/Makefile
:
: On 2007-12-13 00:08, Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > We don't need to invent BSDMAKE. ${MAKE} is sufficient.
: >
: > Submitted by: jmallet@
: >
: > Revision Changes Path
: > 1.344 +2 -3 src/Makefile
:
: Cool! That sounds like a step in a good direction, so we can override
: BSDMAKE in the first stages when /usr/bin/make is, say, gmake :)
Yes. These two changes make it so that one can say 'gerbilmake
buildworld' and have 'gerbilmake' be used for the validation and
bootstrapping FreeBSD's make.
Warner
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
