On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
give thread0 the tid 100000 and bumpt the others to start at 100001
Thanks! While this didn't appear to cause any specific runtime problems I was aware of, it was inconsistent, and with additional threads going under proc0, it might have lead to confusion in DDB where it wouldn't be possible to unambiguously differentiate proc0 from thread0.
Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
