> Simon Marlow wrote:
> > [...] The documentation story is somewhat simpler now:
>
> Cool!
>
> > [...] You need to checkout Haddock into the source tree
> (fptools/haddock)
> > and build it before doing 'make html'. [...]
>
> Just for clarity: Does my build tree for *GHC* have to contain the
> *Haddock* sources, even when I have Haddock installed and in the PATH
> already? That would be a bit strange IMHO... Or is Haddock
> always bundled
> with the upcoming binary distributions?
Yes, it needs to be in the same tree. At the moment while Haddock is
still moving pretty fast, unless you have a bang-up-to-date Haddock
installed it won't be good enough for building the docs. When things
settle down a bit I'll make it look for an installed version too.
I wasn't planning to bundle it with a binary distribution... it's only
needed for building the docs.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
