> Ideally we'd like to keep everyone happy. Sometimes that's not > possible, and this is one of those cases. Now, the 'with' keyword isn't > doing anyone any harm where it is apart from adding a bit of complexity > to the parser, and I'm not really bothered by that, so I really don't > mind leaving it in if you're still using it.
Except that it conflicts with an identifier used in a standard library. Could we fix this using the same ugly hack we use for the 'as' keyword? That is, treat it as a keyword only when used in the right context. I'm not sure of the answer - seems like it would require extra lookahead to decide which way 'with' is being used. -- A _______________________________________________ Cvs-hugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-hugs
