Neil Mitchell wrote:
I tried this before, there are lots of things in various places that
break haddock - i saw *** warning *** etc in the code which breaks the
haddock syntax. Much more than just cpp stuff.
I don't think it would be hard to fix it up
long term we need the new Haddock - the one based on GHC - before we can really
process the whole of GHC with Haddock. In the past I've gone through and
removed problems (non-doc-comments that confuse Haddock), but I suspect some may
have crept back in.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
