Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
An automated system would be cool, but it'd require some effort to set
up. In the meantime, we should probably go with SimonM's proposal and
just make GHC use a subset-branch of the main Cabal repo. Pulling
changes over into GHC's Cabal branch would be a manual process, which
would involve running validate. Especially, if, as you wrote, you guys
are currently looking at breaking changes, that would be fairly urgent.
I'd rather not have another round of the GHC build breaking every week.
I've just made GHC's Cabal into a branch. The main Cabal repo is
http://darcs.haskell.org/cabal
and GHC's branch is
http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/Cabal
(the latter used to be a symbolic link to the former, now they're separate
repos). Can Cabal developers check that they're using the main Cabal repo
when pushing, please?
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
