On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:12:51PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote: > > runghc -- -- -fglasgow-exts > > would be needed to run a file named "-fglasgow-exts", compared to
I don't think we should worry too much about making it easy for people to call their sources -fglasgow-exts.hs. In fact, I'm not even too bothered about people who want to pass -fglasgow-exts as a flag, rather than (a) using an OPTIONS_GHC pragma (b) using more specific -XFoo flags (c) using a more portable LANGUAGE Foo pragma. > In any case it seems like ghc ought to have a --run flag to make ghc > itself run a file like runghc, similar to --interactive/ghci? That might be nice: ghc GHCFLAGS --run MODULE PROGRAMFLAGS However, runghc would still need to work out which GHC to run, and would still need to work out where to insert the "--run" in the arguments it is given. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
