On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:54:20PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote: > >> $ ls compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace* > >> compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.bat > >> compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.exe > > > >Ah, this could well be the source of the problem; you should only have > >ghc-inplace.exe. Does removing the others fix it? > > i changed the Makefile to pass the .exe explicitly, which did get the > build rolling again. > > my configuration is cygwin shell, mingw gcc, win/xp, and i did > make distclean, followed by removing outputs of './darcs-all > whatsnew -l',
compiler/stage1 is boring, so they won't be shown by that command. You'd also need to use --boring. > so the other versions are not likely to be left-overs > (shouldn't distclean remove things like libraries/*/configure and > libraries/*/include/*Config.h.in, among others? No; according to http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html none of clean, distclean, mostlyclean, maintainer-clean should remove configure and friends. > if those are > needed for a distribution, should there be a pristine target, to > get the source tree without any generated files?). Yeah, we should probably have a darcs-clean target, or something. > just for the fun of it, there is yet another version, a soft-link from > compiler/ghc-inplace to compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace.exe.., which > is perhaps the one that should be used? I'm not sure why this link is made. > btw, i didn't notice which patch fixed the missing gmp.h issue, That's interesting, I didn't think it was fixed yet. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
